![how does gay sex work resdit how does gay sex work resdit](https://www.executivegrapevine.com/uploads/articles/Sexist-to-men.jpg)
(2) Compared to bottoms, tops are more frequently engaged in (or at least they acknowledge being attracted to) other insertive sexual behaviors. That is to say, based on self-reports of their recent sexual histories, those who identify as tops are indeed more likely to act as the insertive partner, bottoms are more likely be the receptive partner, and versatiles occupy an intermediate status in sex behavior. (1) Self-labels are meaningfully correlated with actual sexual behaviors. Among the group’s major findings- reported in a 2003 issue of The Journal of Sex Research -were these: Several years ago, a team of scientists led by Trevor Hart at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta studied a group of of 205 gay male participants. These are the so-called “Men Who Have Sex With Men” (or MSM) who are often in heterosexual relations as well. Still other men refuse to self-label as tops, bottoms, versatiles or even “gay” at all, despite their having frequent anal sex with gay men. For a small minority, the distinction doesn’t even apply, since some gay men lack any interest in anal sex and instead prefer different sexual activities. In fact, survey studies have found that many gay men actually self-identify as “versatile,” which means that they have no strong preference for either the insertive or the receptive role. submissive”) and others not-well, not for Scientific American, anyway.
![how does gay sex work resdit how does gay sex work resdit](https://i0.wp.com/img.youm7.com/images/NewsPics/gallery/pics/1220158155513254كوشيساكي-أونا.jpg)
People who derive more pleasure (or perhaps suffer less anxiety or discomfort) from acting as the insertive partner are referred to colloquially as “tops,” whereas those who have a clear preference for serving as the receptive partner are commonly known as “bottoms.” There are plenty of other descriptive slang terms for this gay male dichotomy as well, some repeatable (“pitchers vs.
![how does gay sex work resdit how does gay sex work resdit](https://hips.hearstapps.com/rbk.h-cdn.co/assets/cm/14/50/548a7d8da68df_-_1-woman-computer-coffee-s2.jpg)
What’s more, the study of self-labels in gay men has considerable applied value, such as its possible predictive capacity in tracking risky sexual behaviors and safe sex practices. The ubiquity of homosexual behavior alone makes it fascinating. Whether we’re talking about a penis in a vagina or one in an anus, it’s human behavior all the same. But the great thing about good science is that it’s amoral, objective and doesn’t cater to the court of public opinion. I’m very much aware that some readers may think that this type of article does not belong on this website. But like most aspects of human sexuality, it’s not quite that simple. Rather, the distinction concerns gay men’s sexual role preferences when it comes to the act of anal intercourse. No, I’m not referring to the relative generosity or gift-giving habits of homosexuals. Some people simply feel that “heteroflexible” suits them better than “bisexual,” not because they misunderstand or dislike bisexuality, but because it better describes their experience.Īs mentioned before, some people might describe themselves as both bisexual and heteroflexible.It’s my impression that many straight people believe that there are two types of gay men in this world: those who like to give, and those who like to receive. It’s important to remember that, when it comes to orientation, we all get to choose our own labels. Those labels aren’t erasing bisexuality, so why is heteroflexible?” However, as Kasandra Brabaw argues in this Refinery29 article, “People identify as queer, pansexual, fluid, polysexual, and many other words that mean they’re attracted to more than one gender. There’s a common misconception that bisexual people are attracted to people of all genders to the exact same extent, but that’s not true - some bisexual people prefer one gender over others, so the word “heteroflexible” would fit into this definition. In an article in Affinity Magazine, writer Charlie Williams says the term contributes to bi-erasure because what we describe as heteroflexibility is actually just bisexuality. This argument is that someone should simply call themselves bisexual if they’re attracted to more than one gender. Some people still believe that a person can only be attracted to one gender, and that this orientation can’t be flexible.Īnother argument is that “heteroflexible” is a bi-phobic term, meaning that it’s bigoted toward bisexual people. There are a few reasons why the word “heteroflexible” is controversial. Why is this distinction so contentious for some?